C++ Types: Under the Hood

In this post we’re going to explore the SDK part of the Profiler associated to imported structures and also all the C++ internals connected to the layout creation of structures/classes.

At first I thought about subdividing the material into several posts, but at the end it’s probably better to have it all together for future reference.


In the SDK a Layout is the class to be used when we need to create a graphical analysis of raw data. While we can create and handle headers from the UI, it is also possible to do it programmatically.

Creating a layout is straightforward:

The data can be associated to a structure (or array of structures) as well. Please remember that the name of a header is always relative to header sub-directory of the user directory. Saving the layout is not necessary: it’s automatically saved in the project.

Attaching a layout to a hex view is also very easy:

Of course, layouts can be used for operations not related to graphical analysis as well.


Headers are part of the CFF Core and as such the naming convention of the CFFHeader class isn’t camel-case.

A CFFHeader represents an abstract database in which structures/classes and other things are stored. While we won’t use most of its methods, some of them are very useful for common operations.

Let’s say we want to retrieve a specific structure from a header and use it.

The output of this snippet is:

We can specify the following options when retrieving a structure:

These are the same options which are available from the UI when adding a structure to a layout.

When options are not specified, they default to the default structure options of the object. It’s possible to specify the default structure options with this method:

We’ll see later the implications of the various flags.

When I said that a CFFHeader represents an abstract database, I meant that it is not really bound to a specific format internally. All it cares about is that data is retrieved or set. The standard format used by headers is SQLite and you’ll need to use that format when creating layouts associated to structures. However, when using structures from Python it can be handy to avoid an associated header file. When the number of structures is very limited and you don’t need write or other complex operations, structures can be stored into an XML string. In fact, the internal format of structures is XML. Let’s take a look at one:

We can inspect the format of a structure stored in a header from the Header Manager in the Explore tab by double clicking on it. But we can also avoid creating a header altogether and output the schema of parsed structures directly when importing them from C++. Just check ‘Test mode’ and as ‘Output’ select ‘schemas’.

Output schemas

Let’s import a simple structure such as:

The output will be:

To use this structure from Python we can write the following code:

As you can see it’s very simple. I’ll use this method for the examples in the rest of the post, because they’re just examples and there’s no point in creating a header file for them.


As a rule of thumb if a structure contains a pointer (or a vtable pointer) it is always a good idea to specify the desired size. When the size is omitted both in the explicit options and in the default structure options, the size will be set to the default pointer size of an object, which apart for PEObjects and MachObjects will always be 32bits.


When endianness is not specified it will be set to the default of the object. While internally it’s already possible to have individual fields with different endianness, an extra XML field attribute to specify it will be added in the future.


The first thing to say is that there’s a difference between an array of top level structures and an array of fields. Creating a top level array of structures is easy:

The support of arrays is somewhat limited. Multidimensional arrays are only partially supported, in the sense that they will be converted to a single dimension. For instance:

Or in XML:

Will be convrted to:

Also notice that to access an array element in a CFFStruct the syntax to use is not “a[15]” but “a.15”, e.g.:


The only thing to mention about Sub-structures is that complex sub-types are always dumped separately, e.g.:


In Python:

The output:

Being a separate type, we can also use ‘A::Sub’ without its parent.

A new thing we’ve just seen is the presence of multiple structures in a single XML header. I’ve pasted the whole Python code once again just for clarity, in the next examples I won’t repeat it, since the Python code never changes, only the header string does.


Unions just like sub-structures are fully supported. The only thing to keep in mind is that when we have a top level union, meaning not contained in another structure, such as:

Then to access its members it is necessary to add a ‘u.’ prefix. The reason for this is that CFFStructs support unions only as members, so the union above will result in a CFFStruct with a union member called ‘u’.

Anonymous types

Anonymous types are only partially supported in the sense that they are given a name when imported. A type such as the following:

Results in the following xml:

As you can see a ‘_Type_’ + number naming convention has been used to rename anonymous types. The first character (‘_’) in the name represents the default anonymous prefix. This prefix is customizable. If a typedef is found for an anonymous type, then the new name for that type will created by using the anonymous prefix + the typedef name.


Bit-fields are fully supported.


The unnamed field at the end represents the unused bits given the field size, in this case we have an ‘int’ type and we’ve used only 5 bits of it.

There are significant differences in how compilers handle bit-fields. Visual C++ behaves differently than GCC/Clang. Some of the differences are summarized in this message by Richard W.M. Jones.

Another important difference I noticed is how bit fields are coalesced when the type changes, e.g.:

Without going now into how they are coalesced, the thing to remember is that the Profiler handles all these cases, but you need to specify the compiler to obtain the correct result.


Namespaces are fully supported.

Results in:

Moreover, just as in C++ we can use namespaces to encapsulate #include directives.

This will cause all the types declared in ‘Something’ to be prefixed by the namespace (‘N::’). This can be very handy when we want to include types with the same name into the same header file.


Inheritance is fully supported.



Same with multiple inheritance:



The presence of virtual table pointers in structures which require them is fully supported. Let’s take for instance:



Let’s see an example with multiple inheritance:


When virtual tables are involved it is very important to specify the compiler, because things can vary a great deal between VC++ and GCC/Clang.

Virtual Inheritance

Virtual inheritance is fully supported. Virtual inheritance is a C++ feature to be used in scenarios which involve multiple inheritance with a common base class.

Let’s take the complex case of:

Output (Visual C++):

Output (GCC):

As you can see the layout differs from Visual C++ to GCC. Another thing to notice is that members of virtual base classes are appended at the end. There’s a very good presentation by Igor Skochinsky on C++ decompilation you can watch for more information.

Field alignment

Field alignment is an important factor. Structures which are not subject to packing constraints are aligned up to their biggest native member. It’s more complex than this, because sub-structures influence parent structures but not vice versa. Suffice it to say that there are some internal gotchas, but the Profiler should handle all cases correctly.


When a packing constraint is applied, fields are aligned to either the field size or the packing whichever is less. A packing constraint of 1 is essential if we want to read raw data without any kind of padding between fields. For instance, PE structures in WinNT.h are all pragma packed to 1, so we must specify the same packing when using them.


And for the end a little treat: C++ templates. Let’s take for instance:


We can specify template parameters following the C++ syntax:


So, even nested templates are supported. 😉

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *